Kevin Trudeau to Run For Congressional Office?

I’ve heard KT talk about this before, but it’s rather exciting to think about. Ron Paul, Ran Paul and the few good men in office right beside Kevin Trudeau? I believe in essence he would push these already hero’s of the republic to an area of exposing the government that they never knew they could do before. The ENERGY and JEDI like skill Kevin has over his reality is something to behold and it will be felt in Washington. I wholeheartedly agree with his idea and encourage the effort that is being created!

To give you a glimpse of this from his own words I would recommend listening to Feb 5th radio broadcast at KTradionetwork.com or better yet just use this link:

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/12458926

Today, Kevin reveals the real reason why everything is censored in America and what the drug companies are doing to keep you hooked on their drugs. Plus, get the truth behind crop circles and secret society rituals. Self Help: Increase Testosterone Levels Improve Your Education Further Your Training Ask And It Is Given The Only Answer To Cancer Health: McDonald’s Burger 14 Years Later Hair Growth Drug Confirmed To Have Sexual Side Effects Nestle Unveils New Health-Oriented Strategy Dad’s High Fat Diet May Cause Diabetes In Daughters Idiot Researchers Suggest Viagra For Young Boys Wealth: Top U.S. Incomes Grew to a $519 Million Average New Antidepressant Maker Has Wall Street Excited Google Using Income Shifting Techniques NWO: Juan Williams: I Was Fired For Telling The Truth

Advertisements

Ancient Aliens: The Mission – Episode 3

If ancient aliens visited Earth, what was their mission, and is there evidence that points to when they will return? Ancient Sumerian tablets describe an alien race, known as the Anunnaki, who came to Earth to mine for gold. Egyptian hieroglyphs depict hybrid creatures that were part man, part animal. Mysterious crop circles and unexplainable crystal skulls are thought to contain messages that man has yet to decipher. Strange evidence may exist in multiple cultures throughout history suggesting that aliens came here to explore, excavate raw materials, experiment on human beings, and even for pure conquest.

Spread the influence

Balls of Light Created… Crop Circle

Balls of Light Created… Crop Circle

2007

from GoldenAgeToday Website

Winston Keech, an engineer and inventor, describes his first encounter with a crop circle being created at the now-famous “East Field” in Wiltshire, UK.

Mr. Keech says he witnessed an “illuminated object,” about the size of a dinner plate, creating a single crop circle in the same location as the now-famous East Field Formation that appeared on 07-07-07 – September 07, 2007(see photo below).

Keech explains that he was in the field late at night hoping to witness a UFO creating a crop circle, but instead he says he was acutely aware of an “almost taunting, slightly child-like consciousness” pervading the field.

Keech said that he felt like he was being observed and he described the feeling as “intense”. He said he was actually able to see a small illuminated disk in the corner of his eye, leisurely floating above the corn, but he could not see it if he tried to look straight at it.

He states that he observed with his peripheral vision the small disk of light quickly expand to about twenty feet in diameter, at which point the corn began to shake, and then all of it fell at once – the crop circle, he says, was created in a mere 3 seconds.

RELATED
Learn more about the famous East Field formation that took place on 07-07-07 in Commas and Semi Colons.

Video

Documentary Evidence of Crop Circle Forming
East Field 07/07/07
by Nargajuna
August 02, 2007

from YouTube Website


SCIENTIFIC STUDIES “CONFIRM CROP CIRCLES ARE MADE BY BALLS OF LIGHT

by Eltjo Haselhoff

31 July, 2001

from SwirledNews Website

DR ELTJO HASELHOFF is one of the few people on planet Earth to have had a paper published on crop circles in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (‘Physiologa Plantarum’). His paper asserts that the long-recognized connection of crop circles to balls of light may be even stronger than many think. Here, in layman’s terms, Dr Haselhoff outlines the important findings of his paper…


Over the years, numerous people have claimed that they have seen how a crop circle was created by one or more “balls of light”. Recent scientific studies have confirmed these statements:

Circumstantial evidence has shown that crop circles may very well be made by ‘balls of light’ indeed!

This article explains the essential elements of these studies in simple terms.


NODE LENGTHENING
The stems of corn-type plants are characterized by little ‘knuckles’, at several positions along the stems (see Figure 1). These nodes act as a kind of ligament. They allow the plants to bend towards the light, even after they have grown to their full length.

In the early 1990s, the American biophysicist William Levengood discovered that plants inside crop circles often had much longer nodes than those in the undisturbed, surrounding crop.

This effect is illustrated in Figure 2.

Although there are known biological effects that can create node lengthening, these could be easily ruled out.

It was clear that something else had happened.

The effect could be simulated by placing normal, healthy stems inside a microwave oven. The heat induced by the microwaves made the liquids inside the nodes expand, just like the mercury inside a thermometer. This caused the nodes to increase in length, while the amount of lengthening increased proportionally to the amount of microwave energy that was generated.

This finding led to the conclusion that the node lengthening effect may be caused by the involvement of heat, possibly caused by microwave radiation.

In fact, traces of heat have been found innumerable times in crop circles all over the world, such as dehydrated plants, burn marks, and molten snow.

BALLS OF LIGHT
The number of ‘balls of light’ that have been seen by eyewitnesses has increased considerably over the last couple of years.

Sized somewhere between an egg and a football, these bright, fluorescent, flying light objects seem to be somehow related to the crop circle phenomenon. They often appear in the fields during the night a crop circle forms, and have been seen (and filmed!) many times in and around crop circles.

Several persons have even claimed that they witnessed how these balls of light actually created a crop circle.

SCIENCE RESPONDS
In the year 1999, William Levengood and Nancy Talbott published a scientific paper [1] that contained a study to the node lengthening effect in three different crop circles, two in England and one in the USA.

The authors presented a ‘quantitative analysis’; in other words, the article tried to explain the AMOUNT of node lengthening throughout the crop circle, by means of physical models. The authors concluded that the heat (that had made the nodes swell) was electromagnetic in origin.

One year later, I contributed a paper reacting to the one by Levengood and Talbott. This article appeared early 2001 [2].

The paper reinterpreted the data published by Levengood and Talbott and showed that the node lengthening as measured in all three crop circles could be perfectly explained by assuming that a ‘ball of light’ had caused the node swelling effect.

An identical analysis performed on a famous man-made formation (Dreischor, Holland, 1997) did not show these characteristics at all.

My statements can be interpreted as follows: Imagine a dark room with one single light bulb hanging on the ceiling. If you switch on the light, you will notice that right below the light bulb the light intensity on the floor will be brightest. Towards the edges of the room, the floor will gradually become darker. This light distribution on the floor is well understood, and can be described with high accuracy.

The exact light distribution on the floor depends on the HEIGHT of the light bulb.

When the light bulb is hanging very low, almost touching the floor, the floor underneath the light bulb will be very bright, but the intensity will rapidly become less as you move away from it (Figure 3).

When the light is hanging high on the ceiling, however, the light intensity underneath the light will be much less and be more evenly distributed over the floor (see Figure 3). Because this mechanism is so well known, one can actually derive the height of the light bulb after measuring the light distribution on the floor.

This is what I suggested.

As explained above, the swollen nodes inside the crop circles may be thought of as many little thermometers, expanding their length with increasing heat.

If one assumes that the heat was induced by a small spherical shape emitting electromagnetic radiation, the theoretical heat distribution on the floor can be accurately determined (similarly to the case of the light bulb, as discussed above). I demonstrated that the measured node lengths in all of the three crop circles studies by Levengood and Talbott perfectly matched the temperature distribution that would be caused by a small ball of light, hanging in the air above the centre of the circles, emitting intense heat.

An identical analysis was repeated on a formation in Holland [3]. An eye witness claimed that this crop circle was created in a matter of seconds, while a “ball of light” was floating in the air, right above the centre of the circle [4].

Figure 4 shows the results.

The yellow bars indicate the average node length measured at seven different locations across the crop circle, from one edge (position b1), through the centre (a4), to the opposite edge (b7). Note the perfect symmetry, which is remarkable!

Similar graphs were obtained from two different cross sections through the circle, revealing a perfect circular symmetry: long nodes towards the centre of the circle, shorter nodes towards the edges.

The thick, continuous, bluish line represents the theoretical value of the node length across the circle, if it were caused by a ball of light at a height of 4 meters and 10 centimeters. (This height corresponded to the estimate of the eyewitness). Just like the three crop circles analyzed by Levengood and Talbott, the theoretical values for the node length (blue line) correspond perfectly to the measurements (yellow bars).

Consequently, the circumstantial evidence left in the fields was in perfect agreement with the words of the eyewitness:

the crop circle was indeed created with the involvement of a “ball of light”.


CONCLUSIONS
My paper shows that the node lengthening in several crop circles corresponds perfectly to the effect that would be created by a ball of light, heating up the crop during the creation of the crop circle. This is not the case for a man-made formation.

The amount of node lengthening, and in particular its symmetry over the crop circles, lack any trivial explanation. Consequently, the study confirms the words of eyewitnesses, stating that they saw how crop circles were created by “balls of light.”

My paper does not attempt to explain where the balls of light come from, nor does it explain how the crop is flattened. It does, however, give a strong argument to take the “ball of light” phenomenon, as well as the words of eyewitnesses, very seriously, and I hope will stimulate further study.

Finally, it should be mentioned that all these findings and conclusions have been published in ‘peer-reviewed’ scientific journals. In order to guarantee a high level of reliability, such journals employ so-called ‘referees’ (objective, anonymous experts), who accurately check each contributed paper for errors and inconsistencies before it is published. Consequently, conclusions published in peer-reviewed scientific journals can not be simply dismissed as wild fantasy or pseudo-science.

Therefore, it is fair to say that recent scientific findings have established considerable progress in understanding the crop circle phenomenon, although many questions still remain unanswered.

REFERENCES

[1] W C Levengood, N P Talbott, ‘Dispersion of energies in worldwide crop formations’, Physiol. Plant. 105: 615-624 (1999).
[2] E H Haselhoff, ‘Comment to Physiol. Plant. 105: 615-624″, Physiol. Plant. 111: 123-125 (2001).
[3] E H Haselhoff, http://www.dcccs.org/id48.htm
[4] See, for example, N P Talbott, http://www.crystalinks.com/crop1999.2.html or http://www.labyrinthina.com/crop.htm.

Video

One of the more interesting videos concerning crop circles may be seen in this documentary from the U.K..

The producers interviewed physicist Dr. Eltjo Haselhoff of the Netherlands. Dr. Haselhoff offers scientific proof that at least some crop circles are indeed formed by balls of light.

His research and evidence was even accepted after peer review for the internationally recognized scientific journal, Physiologia Plantarum.

Lights Forming Crop Cirlces
by tombstoner79
July 29, 2007
from YouTube Website



The Sun Is Cold – Not Hot.

As my guest here on this website I want to invite you to become an affiliate of The Global Information Network, and discover how you can use the help of Multi-Billionaires to get what you want, but not only that learn how you can STOP corruption!Click HERE to join the Global Information Network for FREE as an Affiliate

and get access to free information seminars on Health, Relationships & Success. Everyone want’s this information they just don’t know where to go!
(For Additional Information Visit Madstone Mystery Labs Inc)

The Sun Is Cold

by Luis E. Prada

www.luisprada.com

Updated August 22, 2003.

The sun is really cold, contrary to what official science says.

As actual proof, the outer space exposed to sun rays without any blockage from atmosphere is really extremely cold to approximately 3 oK (-273 oC), water freezes approximately at 4 oC. Why is it not then extremely hot, since when sun is resplendent, in summer for instance, and there are no clouds is hot outdoors? Heat is caused by a thermal reaction between sun rays and the electromagnetic planetary aura, the Van Allen lines or the morphogenetic fields of matter as taught in ancient arcane wisdom (1) and in the book Telos (2).

See the following response about the temperature of the space at: http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980301b.html .  Here is the text from that website:

“The Question:
All I wanted to ask you is that if we put a thermometer in Space with no other light or heat source around and absolutely no background radiation there, what would it read? Would the temperature be really cold or what?
“The Answer:
“Yes, it would be really cold. Temperature measures the energy per “degree of freedom” (i.e., way something can move) of whatever molecules happen to be around. So, it becomes so cold that the molecules stop all together, then this is the “absolute zero” temperature. On the Celsius Temperature Scale (i.e., water freezes at 0, and boils at 100) this takes place at -273 o C.

“We usually use the Kelvin temperature scale, where Zero Kelvin is this “absolute zero” temperature — or -273 o C. Water freezes at +273 o Kelvin and water boils at +373 o Kelvin.

“If we put a thermometer in darkest space, with absolutely nothing around, it would first have to cool off. This might take a very very long time.  Once it cooled off, it would read 2.7 o Kelvin. This is because of the “3 degree microwave background radiation.” No matter where you go, you cannot escape it — it is always there.”

Answer by Jonathan Keohane for Ask a High-Energy Astronomer.

The sun rays once reaching Earth create heat on matter.  Behind a tree, for instance,  the temperature is cooler because the sun rays do not directly interact with the morphogenetic fields of the particle matter of our bodies, but through radiation (refraction).  On outer space the space station and astronauts exposed to the sun rays experience a temperature of approximately 200oC since there are no clouds that deviate or reflect the sun rays.  In the dark side, when Earth is between the astronauts and the sun, the temperature is very cold, as stated above.  The absence of other matter makes less of a refraction possible.

The Solar Wind Is Plasma – Space Plasma Cannot Be Duplicated in the Lab Yet
From http://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/Ielect.html:Ions and electrons in space are usually intimately mixed, in a “soup” containing equal amounts of positive and negative charges. Such a mixture is known as a plasma (the same term has a different meaning in medicine; (see the history of plasma). In many respects it behaves like a gas, but when electric and magnetic forces are present, additional properties come to light, quite unlike those of ordinary gases. 

The ionosphere above our heads is a plasma. Unlike air, it conducts electricity, and in fact, the ionosphere in the polar regions carries large electric currents, as is discussed in a later section. The electric conductivity of the ionosphere, unlike that of metals or seawater, is very much influenced by the Earth’s magnetic field. This is a rather special plasma, because the ionosphere also contains a fairly high number of neutral atmospheric molecules, with which the ions and electrons constantly collide.

In contrast, collisions are extremely rare in the solar wind. If this were an ordinary gas, or if the Earth lacked a magnetic field, the solar wind would have penetrated all the way to the top of the atmosphere and would then have flowed around the Earth, the way water flows around a rock in a stream. Something like that in fact happens at the planet Venus, which seems to have no magnetic field of its own. At Earth, however, a strong magnetic field confronts the solar wind, forming a much bigger obstacle than the Earth itself. Because the solar wind is a plasma, it is forced to detour around the Earth’s field, creating a large shielded cavity around the Earth —the magnetosphere.

The explanation of space phenomena thus requires a good understanding of plasma physics. Unfortunately, no laboratory can duplicate the large dimensions and the very low particle collision rates found in space plasmas. The behavior of such plasmas can be sometimes simulated by computers, but ultimately, to figure what actually happens, one needs to send instruments into space and study their observations.

The obvious next question is: If space is cold, how do then scientists measure the temperature of the sun?  Scientists measure the temperature on the sun by examining its color. Just like a hot iron bar changes from red to “white” hot as the bar heats up. To me this is the same thing as concluding that the sun rotates around the Earth because it seems to rise in the East and set in the West, or that the Earth is flat because the way it looks from the surface. Because iron changes color as is heated, and because we see those heated-iron-colors in the sun, the conclusion is that the sun behaves like iron and is hot and its emitting colors are indicative of the temperature at its various points. Is it not still thinking with the “flat-Earth mentality”? Better would be to send a space probe to the sun and measure its temperature. The dilemma is how to measure temperature without affecting the measure by the reaction of the instrument with the sun rays.  But, obviously science already has made its mind and it would seem silly to challenge the idea of a hot sun.  The high photonic concentration emitted as light makes believe that this light comes from combustion when in reality comes from atomic excitation in the plasma.

In a sense it is understandable to conclude that the Sun is hot since is the source of energy for our planet and when rises in the East the temperature of the Earth surface exposed to the Sun increases as a result of receiving the sun rays and cools off as the sun sets in the West. Also if we are close to a furnace we feel the heat and the colors of fire look like the colors of the sun. This drives to the obvious and logical conclusion that the sun is hot like a caldera. Ironically, by thinking in this mode, by empirical observation, people of the past believed that Earth was flat or created the concept of a geocentric universe. But what looks obvious may not be so.

During formation of suns and galaxies changes in pressure create temperature changes that may soar to super hot following thermodynamic laws, but in a steady state as in a mature sun, the atoms in a state of plasma are actually cool. Plasma is cool, not hot. The photonic effect of change of state from excited atoms to relaxed atoms in plasma causes the release of photons, which are the solar light we see.  Currently science is not in technological conditions to prove this fact.  Sun is formed by plasma of atoms of hydrogen, helium, and others.  But the sun is hollow and the layer of gases is not deep enough as to produce the temperatures of millions of degrees produced by the weight of atoms compacting themselves and generating high temperatures by thermodynamic laws. (Pressure generates temperature).

The energy transfer is produced by waves of thermal radiation as in combustion or by electromagnetic waves (“cold”) as in radiofrequency.  The sun obviously would destroy a satellite that gets too close to its surface not because of the heat but because of the high radiation of waves (gamma, alpha, cosmic, ultraviolet, visible, IR rays, etc. ). A person should not put his/her hand in a plasma of gases not because it may burn but because the high radiation may destroy his/her hand.  The interaction between the morphogenetic fields of the Earth and of any celestial body and also of the matter of animate and inanimate beings (that it is also formed by morphogenetic fields) and the solar radiations is responsible for the heat.  Accurately speaking the sun is neither hot nor cold in its steady state since it is plasma and its radiations are neither cold nor hot.  The temperature of this plasma is affected by thermodynamic laws.  But comparatively speaking to the millions of degrees attributed to its surface it is actually cold, not freezing cold though.

I love science and technology, but what I dislike is the cocky position of established “official” science, that buries its head in the sand when confronted with something they cannot explained. Have you seen a scientific work and position on the Crop Circles of England and around the world? Solution to the problem: If can’t explain it, ignore it. And if a colleague tries to explain it or makes a serious study of it, then follow “The Four Steps of A New Idea” described by Mahatma Gandhi (see them in Small Discourses, Series I, at:  http://www.luisprada.com/series_i.htm ).

* First They Ignore You, Then They Make Fun Of You, Then They Fight You, Then You Win <- Four Steps

From the Book “Secret of the Andes” by Brother Phillip (George Hunt Williamson), Chapter “Transcript of the Hierarchy”, Archangel Michael Message, pages 123 and 124.
(…) 

Rev. 12:7: And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon…

Michael and his angels refers to the inhabitants of the worlds beneath the corona of the Sun.  What is the nature of the Sun?  It is not, of course, cold in the sense of degrees, but is not a flaming body.  What is beneath the Solar corona which no man has seen?  What do you think is its nature?  It is a cool body.  What is beneath it?  Planets.  Everything is duplicated in the Father’s realm.  Study the construction of the atom.  There are as many electrons as protons in each.  If you have twelve planets without, the Sun is the nucleus; twelve planets are the electrons and within the nucleus are the protons.

Twelve neutrons.  What are they—speaking of the System, that is?  The twelve bodies beneath the surface of the corona: The Sun is composed of twelve bodies, and their revolutions bring about the strange eleven-year Sun-spot cycle.  But the inhabitants —because there are inhabitants upon the Sun— are different from those who inhabit worlds.  I could not begin to explain life as it exists there.  But they are worlds.  Life does not exists in flaming gas.  These beings are the angels, so-called.  Michael and his legions, —the archangels, —are all sun dwellers.

Why are there only seven archangels?  Because there were only seven planets of the ancients.  Because they did not have the complete picture this did not mean there were not more.  The real ancients knew there were more.  Hence the twelve astrological signs, as also the twelve archangels.

(…)

The following contribution to this article “The Sun Is Cold” was written by Víctor Hugo Ayala-Cañedo, mail_victor@mailbanamex.com.
Original in Spanish, translation to English by Luis Prada.
Víctor Hugo Ayala-Cañedo is a Rational Spiritist.  He belongs to the Magnetic-Spiritual School (“Escuela Magnético-Espiritual”) of the Universal commune with its world see in City and Colonia Jaime, Argentina.  He lives in Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico, and he is an informatics instructor in a training center of the Mexican federal government.  He belongs to the group of moderators of a forum where are treated subjects related to the theme of the School and which has originated the Internet site called “The Library” (“La Biblioteca”), referred to in this message.  The forum address (Spanish only) is: http://mx.groups.yahoo.com/group/eme_dela_cu/
Hi, Brother Veritus:
The nature of the universe is, at this point of the scientific material progress, impossible to negate: it is electromagnetic.  Magnetism is in each one of, let’s say, corpuscles of the universe, because in all where there is an electric charge, positive or negative, by necessity it is that also there is a magnetic field and another electrostatic, thus the referred electromagnetic composition.
If each portion of plasma, gases, materials, asteroids, satellites, planets, and in short, each luminary we see in the Universe, is formed of these corpuscles, and these, joined, augment their primitive properties and transfer them to their composites, it is not to be surprised that in these ones the charges are seen appearing, the electrostatic and the electromagnetic fields, in such a way that if it were the case of constructing a mathematical model of the universe and its components, it would be enough to use coils, capacitors, wires and a source of energy.
On the other hand, the material most related to magnetism is iron and also is one of the most abundant metals in the earth’s core, let’s say, in her heart and her blood, as it is also within the human body in the form of red corpuscles which color is due precisely to this metal.
We also observe that the legendary practice of the use of magnetism to penetrate the minds of others, with which it is achieved the magnetic imposition and this reveals that our material and spiritual composition is of the same origin: magnetism.
Doesn’t it happen also with the molecular composition of matter?  This, finally, puts us on the path of admitting that only a substance exists, and that this one is the magnetism, which origin must be a source so infinitely powerful, but so infinitely sublime as to make itself present in all the infinite universe, so weak as the charge of an electron, but so infinitely majestic as the shine of the worlds we see in the universe and even more, that our eyes cannot reach to see.
Well then, returning to the subject, the Heat of the Sun, as we are both agreed, is not a direct effect as the produced by a combustion, as so magisterially you have exposed and developed it.  This same idea I have had since a child and finally I see that a person in this world has the same arguments that I have and that causes me great joy, as to scientifically glimpse that our Father, the Sun, be an inhabited world, and that the electromagnetic vibrations we receive from them, be not other thing more but the good desire of its inhabitants, of higher spiritual progress than ours, the degree of embracing so much space in all their system, that we do not lack in life the energy over us and on the other planets to make sprout all forms of life that depend on that.
I think astronomers hide from us a very valuable material in this regard, since I do not consider there exists so much obstinacy as to continue looking for the sun in its reflection on the water.
I invite you to read in the “Library” (“Biblioteca”) of the School I belong to, the works in it published, where you will find a rational study of the natural causes that move and give origin to universal life: www.geocities.com/eme_dela_cu (Spanish only).
Fraternally,
Víctor Hugo Ayala-Cañedo

Second Part

The Sun Is Cold

Second Part

Dr. George Hunt Williamson

First posted on February 25, 2.003.

Excerpt of Chapter 3, “Magnetism, the Universal ‘I AM’ “, from the book “Other Tongues, Other Flesh” (1) by Dr. George Hunt Williamson.

“”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””

The first body is the Sun (acting as a nucleus).  Over one hundred years ago, in 1854 [sic] (2), the eminent astronomer Sir William Herschel suggested that the Sun may be inhabited and that the inhabitants may no more suffer from the intense heat than those who live in the tropical regions of Earth!  He believed the Sun to be cool body, not a hot, flaming gas ball.

“Over one hundred years ago … the eminent astronomer Sir William Herschel suggested that the Sun may be inhabited and that the inhabitants may no more suffer from the intense heat than those who live in the tropical regions of Earth!  He believed the Sun to be cool body, not a hot, flaming gas ball.”  —Dr. George Hunt Williamson
Sir William Herschel (1738-1822) was a German-born English astronomer who constructed powerful telescopes to systematically explore the heavens.  He discovered Uranus, two satellites of Saturn, and cataloged many double stars and nebulae.

Since it has been shown that the satellite planets are magnetic in nature, [Note of Editor: he refers to a previous dissertation in this Chapter] it is only right to assume that the governing body that rules those planets is also magnetic in nature.  So, we might say that the Sun is the magnetic “brain” or ganglion of our entire Solar System.  Its forces are the directing intelligence of all the functions of our System.  It is from this great central, nuclear body that the planets draw their magnetic energy so that they, too, may generate forces.

The Sun’s vortex is very intense as would be expected of such a huge body, and it must extend to the very outer limits of the System.  Its atmosphere has three main layers:  the chromosphere, the reversing layer and the photosphere.  Completely enveloping these layers is the corona.  When photographed in hydrogen light the Sun displays its magnetic structure very well.  Such a photograph shows a grainy effect very similar to that produced when iron filings are sprinkled in a magnetic field.

Scientists today state that the Sun is a gigantic atomic furnace radiating a tremendous amount of heat to the satellite planets each second.  The temperature at its surface is said to be thousands of degrees, and the internal temperature is supposedly in the millions of degrees.  However, it is unexplainable how superheated gases can act magnetically.  For it is an elementary fact of physics that a substance loses its magnetism when heated!  Since astronomers have definitely recorded magnetic effects upon the Sun, we have a direct conflict between the Sun’s true nature and the suggested temperature.  This conflict only indicates that the Sun is not the superheated mass of gases that scientists think it is, but rather a cool body as Herschel said it was.

There is much evidence to prove that the Sun is, indeed, a cool body.  The process of determining the Sun’s temperature is very complex and involves the radiation laws of physics.  Fundamentally, here is how such temperatures are determined: the radiation of the body per square centimeter per second times the body’s effective temperature quadrupled equals the rate of radiation quadrupled times the body’s luminosity divided by its diameter squared.  In solving for the Sun, ones comes up with an average of fifty-nine hundred absolute degrees.  The mathematics involved is agreeable, but astronomers base their calculations on two assumptions:

First, they assume the Sun is a perfect radiating body; second, and most important, they assume that the Sun is radiating heat! This is because they believe that heat on Earth, as well as heat on other planetary bodies, comes directly from the Sun.  People feel the heat when they stand in sunlight, so they say the Sun must be a burning mass radiating that heat.  That is like saying a radio transmitter radiates sound waves because when we turn on our radios, we hear sound.  But we know that such a transmitter radiates radio waves, and that these waves are turned into sound inside the radio!

In 1543, a great comet came closer to the Sun than any previous comet had and this was repeated by another comet in 1882.  They actually entered the Sun’s corona, which supposedly has a temperature of one million degrees absolute.  These comets traveled over one million kilometers through this blazing corona and emerged unscathed with no change in velocity or direction.  If the Sun is radiating heat, why didn’t these comets instantly disintegrate on entering a tremendous heat of one million absolute degrees?  Surely nothing could survive such a treatment!

Astronomers have told us that the planet Mercury is devoid of life because it is only thirty-six million miles from the Sun.  They have told us that if Mercury where any closer, it would turned into “nothingness” long ago.  How then did the two comets survive without at least showing some effects of their journey through the Sun’s corona?  We must conclude that the answer is that the sun does not radiate heat, as such!  Therefore, it cannot be any kind of a super-hot body.

The Solar Wind (Prominences) and Sunspots
“Some prominences travel at the unbelievable speed of 450 miles per second and reach an altitude of one million miles; that’s one hundred ninety-one thousand miles more that the Sun’s diameter.  To add to the oddity of this phenomenon is the fact that these prominences rise to fantastic heights, and then just “hang” in midair, unsupported, in complete defiance of Newton’s law of gravity!”

The prominences supply us with some more proof of the above conclusion. These prominences are said to be hydrogen gas explosions and first appear in the Sun’s photosphere.  There are many theories, but as yet astronomers have been puzzled over their origin.  The behavior of these so-called hydrogen clouds of gas contradicts one of the oldest and supposedly, most stable law of physics …, Newton’s law of gravity.

Some prominences travel at the unbelievable speed of 450 miles per second and reach an altitude of one million miles; that’s one hundred ninety-one thousand miles more that the Sun’s diameter.  To add to the oddity of this phenomenon is the fact that these prominences rise to fantastic heights, and then just “hang” in midair, unsupported, in complete defiance of Newton’s law of gravity!  Others appear to “materialize” from nowhere, and hang motionless.  Surely the Sun with all its tremendous mass and “pulling” power could bring these prominences down again if they were composed of hydrogen gas.  Astronomers said they are composed of such gas because the spectroscope has labeled them such.  But the spectroscope is very inaccurate because between the Sun’s atmosphere and this instrument, the atmosphere of the Earth intervenes, and the upper atmosphere of our planet contains almost pure hydrogen.  This could be the hydrogen that astronomers say is on the Sun.

Sunspots and prominences have puzzled scientists for years, yet they are part of the same phenomenon.  Sunspots and prominences are manifestations of the Sun’s auroral activity as viewed from different angles.  They have never photographed the solar prominences except at the edge of the Sun.  Prominences take the form of, or appear as, sunspots when seen on the face of the Sun.  The shape and particulars of the prominences cannot be observed unless the light of the Sun is blotted out.  These prominences are not superheated hydrogen gas because their very behavior proves otherwise!  They behave as forces, not as elements (gas, etc.)

The prominence force of the Sun is similar to the auroral force emanating from the polar vents of the Earth.  The auroral force is known as the aurora borealis in the Northern Hemisphere, and the aurora australis in the Southern Hemisphere.  The names “northern” and “southern” lights are also given to this phenomenon.  This Earth force, which is continually being sent into the atmosphere, has the exact characteristics of the prominence force of the Sun.  Although it is continually emanating from the Earth, it is only seen at certain times when atmospheric conditions are right.

The auroral and prominence force are identical.  Under the thick atmosphere of the Sun are hidden planetary bodies that are emanating aurora forces known on the Sun as prominence forces.  The fact that there are planets under the Sun’s photosphere is also evident from the fact that in atomic structure the electrons are balances by an equal number of protons within the nucleus.  This makes a balanced system.

The prominence forces manifest in the atmosphere of the hidden, or inner, planets pass through their electromagnetic field, then manifest once again in the atmosphere of the Sun.  Then what about the so-called hanging prominences which “materialize” from nowhere in the upper atmosphere of the Sun?  The solution to this baffling question can be found easily.  When the auroral forces of the outer planets (Earth, Mars, etc.) pass through their vortex or electromagnetic field, they are ultimately drawn onto the great Sun body where they manifest.  At this stage, astronomers observe the “hanging prominences” which “materialize” from nowhere!

Another puzzle that has confronted astronomers, is that some sunspots appear to have polarity and some prominences are pulled mysteriously toward certain sunspots.  Prominences and sunspots have already been shown to be manifestations of the auroral activity of the hidden or inner planets under the Sun’s photosphere.  There are twelve inner planets and twelve outer planets.

Astronomers ask why sunspots arise at the more or less irregular intervals of eleven years, and why do first spots of a new series appear in high altitudes, and why is there a slow progression of the spots toward the solar equator as the sunspot cycle advances, and why is there a change in polarity of sunspots on alternate cycles?  The answers to these questions will give an accurate and complete theory of sunspots, and the answers lie in the fact that the inner or hidden planets create these conditions by their periods of rotation and revolution.

Heat and light are effects of the positive rays of the Sun.  Heat is felt on the Earth because the Sun’s positive rays intersect with its negative atmosphere and crust causing a friction or change in the quality of particle motion given off as heat radiation as a result of this friction.  The effect of the Sun’s rays on the Earth’s atmosphere is also responsible for the phenomenon of visible light that results from a different kind of particle motion.

The eyes are sensitive only to positive light rays reflected from negative substance; thus light is an interaction of negative and positive forces.  The Sun does not send us heat and light, although it is responsible for its manifestation on Earth; the Sun sends only positive lines of force which interact with the negative crust and atmosphere of the Earth to produce the phenomena of the electromagnetic spectrum, which includes heat and light.

Science has explored the upper atmosphere of the Earth and found that sixty miles above the Earth artificial light is needed, and ninety miles above the Earth it is dark as a “pitch”.  The higher we go the colder it gets, so we see even by logic that heat and light do not come from the Sun.  Only lines of force come from the great Sun body.


“The higher we go the colder it gets, so we see even by logic that heat and light do not come from the Sun.  Only lines of force come from the great Sun body.”

Since distance from, and nearness to the Sun have nothing to do with whether a planet is “boiling” or “frigid”, we can immediately see that all planets in our Solar System have nearly the same climate.  The Earth does not enjoy perfect climate because it is unbalanced magnetically.

What has been learned from space visitors about our Sun is not really anything new, but only a return to the ageless wisdom possessed by the Earth’s most ancient races.  These students of the long ago said that the true color of the Sun was blue, and it is interesting to note that the musical note of blue is Sol, a name for the Sun itself!

(For Additional Information Visit Madstone Mystery Labs Inc)